Developers In Revolt

 A while ago Venkat wrote a a great article: Can "Tech" Die? , where he defined tech thus:


"Tech is a growing agency pie, and a Techie could be defined as someone who is participating in a way that they’re gaining agency faster than secondary actors[finance, politics] can take it away."


The "natural state" of the world, the world at rest, is: developers go to college and slave away getting CS degrees.  They go to work for BigCorp and are managed by guys in suits.  Nobody else knows how to program.  This is a fairly stable system.

But what if it gets disrupted?


Developers can revolt in two different directions:  up or down.

They revolt up by playing their cards so as to get more agency within their organizations.  At a recent technical interview, I---


Well, let's back up.  If you've never had one, most technical interviews go like this:  The interviewer(s) give you a relatively simple programming exercise.  Then they say "Do you have any questions for us?"  And you want to ask things like, "Um, will working for you ruin my life?"  but you probably shouldn't ask that, so you say, "No, I guess not."


Anyway, I'd been restless the night before this one.  I went to bed late.  When I woke up I had that perfect clarity reserved for the newly awoken.  I opened a text file and wrote:

questions I'd ask:

- why are you using clojure?
- what is your salary?
- what do you think about macros?
- if I were to take some time in the middle of the day to try and understand a codebase I wasn't assigned to, what would you think about that?
- if I were to take some time in the middle of the day to work on my editor configuration, what would you think about that?
- if I said in standup that I had spent the entire day prior on my editor configuration, what would you think about that?
- if I said in standup that I had spent the entire day prior "looking for ideas," what would you think about that?
- ..."on Hacker News"?
- the entire week prior?
- what's your vacation policy?
- do your developers have access to your financials?
- ...to your marketing data?
- ...to your BI data?
- can your janitor code?
- do you have any DSL's in production?  Would you like to?
- what does homoiconicity mean to you? 
- has anyone received a bonus for something that did *not* affect the bottom line, or help close a sale?  e.g. writing documentation, refactoring, tooling
- what technology are you most excited about?
- what do you think about dynamically scoped variables?
- how much equity should developers get? (the smaller/newer the company, the worse the above answers can be, and the better this one needs to be)

basically I'm trying to figure out if they believe in individually-empowered developers

So in this (remote) technical interview, I shared my screen and went through (some of) these questions.

Now, I know, some of these seem ridiculous.  I was too embarrassed to ask most of them.  But I asked some of them.

The best part:  THEY TOLD ME THEIR SALARIES.  I bet they hadn't even told each other.



Developers can revolt "down" by, like Prometheus, stealing fire from heaven and gifting it to Man.  No-code tools, open-source libraries, providing an API---like a potlatch, where you give away wealth as a show of power.


That's the post, really, as far as it came to me.  I think more developers will revolt this way.  What will happen?  Hang on.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Interviewing Programmers

Image
I'll be looking for a new job soon, readers! And this has been cause for some reflection. In Emeryville, CA, there is an "international food hall" called the Public Market .  "International food hall" is not a common phrase, because international food halls are not common buildings. But it is basically a food court leveled up a few times---a food court, if you made it eight times the size and gave it its own building. The software world is kind of like this:  a lot of people with very different worldviews crammed in together. What, in your  opinion, are the core concepts of this whole software thing?  The real  important stuff? If you look around, people seem to have very different answers to this, or answers-in-the-form-of-a-culture.  For some it's "agility," for others it's "testing," for others it's "optimization."  Steve Jobs (at least at first) would probably have said it's "empowering creativity...
Read more

Playing Around With J

I pasted the following into a group chat with some friends.    "J is pretty great" |syntax error |       "J is pretty great"    "I don't know how to do strings in it" |open quote |   "I don't know how to do strings in it" |         ^    "It has normal infix notation"         "It has normal infix notation"   |syntax error |       "It has normal infix notation"      5 + 3 8    NB.  Adorably, you start comments with "NB."    NB. J is an offshoot of APL.    NB. APL has a fun history.    NB. Ken Iverson was a math prof @ Harvard, and he got sick of math notation    NB. (Just my kind of guy)    NB. So he made up his own, and brought in a bunch of his own symbols    NB. It was just that---notatio...
Read more

The Flipped Economy, Pt 1.

A few days ago, on the phone with a friend, I found a sentence coming out of my mouth that I wasn't sure I agreed with.  I don't remember the exact words I used; it was something like "The chief shortage in today's economy is access to enterprise buyers," but here's what I meant: We have enough stuff.  We have stuff coming out of our ears!  But this cheers no one; what we are actually concerned about is cash flows . A basic economics class talks about capital investment in this way:  a company, to become more efficient, invests in equipment, or factories, or technology, and thus creates more goods, or the same goods at a cheaper price, etc.  This is what "economic progress" supposedly looks like. Except..."stuff" isn't what people actually buy.  Most people's expenses go into rent, food, education, and health care.  To be sure, "stuff" is an input to the prices of those things, but...is it?  Really?  The real expen...
Read more